HomeNewsSatirical Post: Akpoti-Uduaghan Asks Court to Reject Akpabio’s Motion

Satirical Post: Akpoti-Uduaghan Asks Court to Reject Akpabio’s Motion

Published on


Key Points


  • Akpoti-Uduaghan defends her satirical apology as free speech.

  • Akpabio’s legal team seeks removal and a public apology.

  • Court set to hear both motions on May 12.


Suspended Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to dismiss Senate President Godswill Akpabio’s request to delete a controversial Facebook post.

The post, which she called a “satirical apology,” criticized Akpabio’s leadership and alluded to misconduct in the Senate.

In a motion filed May 5, Akpabio’s lawyers accused her of violating a court order that banned public commentary on an ongoing legal dispute between the two lawmakers.

The case concerns her suspension from the Senate, following a heated February altercation.

In her counter-affidavit, Akpoti-Uduaghan defended her post as constitutionally protected free speech.

She said it was a symbolic protest against what she described as an unfair and politically motivated suspension.

Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal team says post broke no rules

Her lead counsel, Jubril Okutepa, argued that the senator’s Facebook post did not breach the court’s gag order.

He claimed that Akpabio’s motion aimed to harass and intimidate his client for expressing her views.

“The motion is malicious and intended to scandalize me for exercising my constitutional right to free speech,” Akpoti-Uduaghan wrote in her affidavit.

The satirical apology included jabs at the Senate president, suggesting success under his leadership required submission, not merit.

The post quickly went viral, drawing mixed reactions from the public.

Akpabio’s team wants the court to order her to delete the post, issue a written apology in two national newspapers, and file an affidavit of compliance.

Court to hear both sides of satirical apology row

Justice Binta Nyako, who is presiding over the case, previously barred all parties from speaking publicly about the matter. The judge is expected to rule on both motions when the court reconvenes on May 12.

This dispute follows multiple legal battles between Akpoti-Uduaghan and Akpabio. She has sued Akpabio and his aide for ₦100 billion in defamation damages and litigation costs.

Meanwhile, Akpabio’s wife filed two separate suits, seeking ₦350 billion in damages for reputational harm.

As the legal war escalates, the senator continues to challenge her suspension and maintain that her satirical apology represents protected political speech.

Latest articles

ADC Urges Tinubu to Declare Emergency in Katsina, Zamfara

ADC calls on Tinubu to declare emergency in Katsina and Zamfara after deadly attacks leave over 140 people dead in two months.

North Central Leaders Press Case for 2027 Presidency

A coalition insists the North Central must produce president in 2027, warning continued exclusion threatens unity and fairness in Nigeria.

Delta Police Say Officers Can Search Without Warrants

Delta police say officers can conduct warrantless searches, sparking public concern about rights, accountability, and abuse of stop-and-search powers.

Dangote Tops Forbes List as Africa’s Richest Man

Dangote tops Forbes list with $24.4 billion, cementing his 14-year reign as Africa’s richest man and outpacing rivals across the continent.

More like this

ADC Urges Tinubu to Declare Emergency in Katsina, Zamfara

ADC calls on Tinubu to declare emergency in Katsina and Zamfara after deadly attacks leave over 140 people dead in two months.

North Central Leaders Press Case for 2027 Presidency

A coalition insists the North Central must produce president in 2027, warning continued exclusion threatens unity and fairness in Nigeria.

Delta Police Say Officers Can Search Without Warrants

Delta police say officers can conduct warrantless searches, sparking public concern about rights, accountability, and abuse of stop-and-search powers.